Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 6-10 of 673
 This book ROCKS! October 9, 2008
Heather B. Ingram (Cartersville, GA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This book is amazing; I am spreading it amongst family and friends to read. I STRONGLY recommend this book to anyone needing further clarification on our government and how it SHOULD be run. Not just to benefit Ron Paul, but to benefit this Nation. Some things will shock you, I know there were things I didn't know that I know now, and was infuriated by the things I was learning about this Big Government we have.
Write in Ron Paul!!!!!
Awesome Book! First Rate Material. October 8, 2008
FreedomLover101
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
An excellent book. Couldn't put it down. Ron Paul outlines many of the ideas that propelled his campaign to unexpected success. If you want to understand the "revolution" this is an essential place to start!
Should be required reading in every high school civics class. October 7, 2008
K. Costanzo (San Diego, California)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Most Americans are good citizens who work hard and pay their taxes. Therefore, many of them falsely believe that THEY don't have anything to "worry about" when the government ignores or circumvents its' Constitutional limitations. They are especially prone to accept the government's constitutional abuses when the government proclaims that its' actions will make its' citizens safer or more prosperous. This book will open their eyes and enable them to see how unrestrained big government has ALREADY negatively impacted their lives in many ways and how it will continue to do so if we, as citizens, continue to tolerate its' encroachments on our freedoms. This book shows how the constitutional abuses we were told would make us safer and more prosperous have actually had the opposite effect.
My President: Ron Paul October 7, 2008
Daniel Beaulieu (Madison, Wisconsin)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This is an excellent book, I've read it several times. Just wanted to add my rating.
 Read it - and weep October 6, 2008
George Goldberg (Tucson, AZ United States)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Paul writes clearly and seems to believe what he says, a rather refreshing departure for a politician. I am in any event naturally biased in his favor, as I agree with a great deal of his program, including no intervention in other nations, no sanctions on Iran or Cuba, no foreign aid, no sugar quotas, no draft or compulsory "national service," no executive orders except for administrative matters, no signing statements, no federal drug war, no NEA or Dept of Education, no Patriot Act or limitations on habeas corpus, no FISA violations.
My one problem, but it is major, is Paul's failure to even address, in the context of abolishing most federal programs and regulations, such issues as child labor, minimum wage, OSHA, FDA, food labeling, anti-trust, &c. None of these issues is mentioned in the Constitution, so under Paul's philosophy, none should be addressed by federal law. But are we really upset that a 14-year-old child may not work for more than a specified number of hours, or a 10-year-old child work in a factory, or a 6-year-old child work at all? Yes, the states can provide for child labor laws and all the rest, but states, especially small ones, can more easily be corrupted than can the federal government, so a state with, say, one significant industry might be persuaded - that is, bribed and intimidated - into allowing child labor and abolishing workplace safety regulations. As for, e.g., food labeling, who but the federal government could order and administer it? I suspect Paul would allow the federal government to deal with some of these problems, but his book is so anti-regulation that he should have at least discussed the subject and specified which regulations are appropriate and even necessary.
As for abandoning the incorporation doctrine (where the Supreme Court applied the Bill of Rights to the states) and returning civil rights issues to the states, which Paul strongly supports, I don't think most Americans really want to allow Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire or South Carolina to create a state church (all of these states had established churches at the time the Constitution was adopted - the only thing that prevents them having them now is the First Amendment, which Paul would argue only applies to the federal government, and it does indeed start "Congress shall make no law ... "), or tortured confessions (Fifth Amendment), or a single state-controlled newspaper (First Amendment), &c. Original intent sounds good, it's easy to make fun of a "living" constitution, but some things have been settled over the years which might best be left settled.
Of course there is no chance that any part of Paul's program will ever become law. As he himself says, repeatedly, the governmental policies which have led to our most serious troubles, especially regarding the economy, are pursued by both parties. Since there is no viable third party, and none in prospect, there would appear to be no hope at all of realizing any of his major policies - we will not return to the gold standard much less abolish paper money, we will not abolish the Fed or limit its power to create money "out of thin air," we will not bring our troops home from all or even most of the 130 countries they are now in, we will not abandon the possibility of a draft, we will not cancel foreign aid, the incorporation doctrine will not be reversed. Paul has often been the sole dissenting vote in the House, unable to persuade a single member of his own party to vote with him - an admirable adherence to principle, no doubt, but not a harbinger of change.
What, then, is the message of this book? Realistically, it is that the American political scene is a hopeless mess, and that our economic future, even hope for the retention (or return) of our freedoms, is grim. We simply have no way of returning to the constitutional scheme which held us in such good stead for so long - after all, as Paul notes, our Founding Fathers warned us that if we ever lose the protections they put in place for us, we will never get them back. Well, we have manifestly lost many of them - that is the central theme of this book - so ... so, what? Get used to it? Eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow the dollar collapses and the federal government starts rounding up dissidents?
I'm too old to be worried for myself, but I surely am worried for my children, but Paul has no useful advice for them. You can't keep people who want to be free down? Of course you can. Plenty of people in Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Soviet Russia, Communist China, Wahabbi Saudi Arabia and many other despotisms wanted (want) to be free but were (are being) destroyed by the system - arrested without cause, tortured, starved, murdered. The Founding Fathers were surely right - a republic, they said, if you can keep it. We have for a long time been negligent about keeping our government under control. The Bush Administration, led by Cheney, believed we would not take any effective steps to protect our freedoms no matter how egregiously they were violated; so it violated them, egregiously, and we proved Cheney right. Will McCain put a stop to these violations of our freedoms? I doubt it. Will Obama? I hope so, but I won't hold my breath; after all, a Democratically controlled Congress has utterly failed to do so.
So, a fine book, a good man, but not, I fear, a prophet.
|
