 | |  |
| Performance [1970] | ![Performance [1970]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51X76011TRL._SL160_.jpg)
enlarge | Directors: Nicolas Roeg, Donald Cammell Actors: James Fox, Mick Jagger, Anita Pallenberg, Michele Breton, Ann Sidney Studio: Warner Home Video Category: Video
List Price: £6.99 Buy New: £2.96 You Save: £4.03 (58%)
Buy New/Used/Collectible from £0.99
Avg. Customer Rating:   (5 reviews) Sales Rank: 208
Format: Hifi Sound, Pal, Widescreen Language: English (Original Language) Rating: Suitable for 18 years and over Media: VHS Tape Running Time: 100 minutes Number Of Items: 1
EAN: 5014786113125 ASIN: B00004CUX6
Release Date: August 16, 1993 Theatrical Release Date: 1970 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review The extraordinary 1970 British film Performance marked the directorial debut of cinematographer Nicolas Roeg (working with Donald Cammell). James Fox portrays a London gangster who has to hide away for awhile and ends up staying with a fading rock star (Mick Jagger). The latter recognises something of his old, daring self in the violent criminal, and after pushing open the boundaries of the hood's experience with psychedelics, the two men begin to intertwine as one. The film is an exciting pool of ideas about real and presumed power, about the mysteries of "performance" as a pressing outward toward an abandonment of identity and embrace of revelation. Beneath it all, however, is Roeg and Cammell's suspicion that the worlds of these two men--pop shaman and underworld soldier--are not dissimilar in their self-serving goals. --Tom Keogh
|
| Customer Reviews:
  One of the best films I ever saw May 22, 2007 I can't imagine for a single minute that anyone would be buying this DVD if they hadn't first seen the movie, so if you're reading this you probably know what it's all about. Psychadelic cool and London Gangster cool meet in a movie with a story, and with some incredibly beautiful and totally believable characters. It's maybe twenty years since I first saw this but it still makes me want to take a can of black spray paint to my bedroom walls and act so aloof that exquisite foreign women can't resist my rock star charms. It does what a good movie should, it removes you from your humdrum existence and transports you the other world that you always thought you belonged to. Wonderful.
  The Ultimate Performance, but sadly over-looked. July 8, 2004 6 out of 6 found this review helpful
It was the film that made me love films. I first saw it at a cinema after a beautiful night of hedonism (part of an all-nighter in Bristol; U.K), and it was screened at about 5.00am. Later that day, I saw Jagger and co. at Bristol football ground. I don't think I can add much more to some of the eloquent reviews already posted. I have an encyclopaedic knowledge of it, and have lost count ( 20+?) of the times I have seen it. If only the full cut had been released. If I waxed lyrical about it, I wouldn't know where to stop. Just two points. Read Nabokov's "Despair", as it was being read by both Cammell and Roeg whilst they were filming it. The novel connects with the film. Also : a companion piece to this masterpiece is "The Servant", in which James Fox also appears.
  Dated, yet not to be missed May 30, 2004 5 out of 5 found this review helpful
Performance is something of a period piece, exploring its two protagonists with self-conscious experimentation. Both are moral men on their own terms, while outside the mainstream; gangster and drug addled rock star. Ultimately, they come to be defined in terms of each other - as each other's opposite or mirror image.
  More than a gangster filem February 1, 2004 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Its almost easier to define this film negatively - that is by what it is not: It's not a gangster film; it's not a film about rock stars in the London of the 'swinging sixties'; it's not social realism and it's not a vehicle for any of the 'celebrities' who just happen to appear in it's cast.This film is a beautifully constructed work of art that transcends narrow classification, with a narrative that challenges our very perception of ourselves as unitary beings in a space-time universe; it forces us to ask questions about our psychic continuity and questions our 'common sense' notions of self/other. How does it do this? well Performance achieves it's goals through a dazzling display of psychedelic and mythical symbolism - the sheer creative power of which carries the film beyond it's genre, and the veiwer beyond the limitataions of his or hers rational mind. When we compare this visionary work to the current productions from Hollywood and elsewhere it is like receiving a message from another universe! There is no comparison. This is a unique work. Just don't expect a hollywood ending. This film is an enigma.
  A disturbing, fascinating and notoriously difficult film February 13, 2001 21 out of 51 found this review helpful
'Performance' has been frequently referred to by some critics as a great British gangster movie along with 'Get Carter' or 'Brighton Rock' and by others as being a major modernist text. For me it is neither of these things. The gangster motif only occupies half of the film and the narrative was shredded by the production company after shooting. That said the gangster setting is effectively menacing and of vital consequence to the thematic thrust of the work. Modernism (as it was by the late 1960s) was in summary an ideological attempt to purify forms against the burdens of history or aesthetics - to affirm a functional use value orientated system - or the 'political economy' of the sign. 'Performance' seeks to challenge the dominant semiotic thesis, to blur the distinctions between sign and signifier - to confront conceptions of meaning and logic in the tradition of Nietzsche. In the sense of being contra-modernism, 'Performance' might be at the vanguard of the postmodern movement, but like Jean Baudrillard, at the heretic post-structuralist arm of that movement. 'Performance' in many ways is there at the margins; the margins of pop and the underworld; of crime and big business; of the optimistic 1960s and dour 1970s; of decaying modernist ideology and advancing postmodernism; of what could be produced by a major film company. Above all the film seeks to expose the myth of the binary oppositions which are underwritten by our system of language: life/death, male/female, fantasy/reality and the entire problematic of the representative relationship. This problematic, and its references to the work of Bataille and Borges, is eloquently described in Jean Baudrillard's 1976 work 'Symbolic Exchange and Death' (translated into English in 1993) which should be essential reading for anyone who is intrigued and mystified by this important film. On the other hand, those who seek a taut gangster thriller would be well advised to look elsewhere to avoid disappointment
|
|
|
|  | |